People that will not admit their own ego or the unconscious part of their mind!

[Chiun]

3.31.09 Month, date, year, post****Stephen Paul Vanier..........All
Rights Reserved ......Not to be reprinted or e-mailed or shared
without the written permission of the author Stephen Paul Vanier.
Copyrighted '09. ----- alt.consciousness.4th-way,
alt.zen,talk.religion.buddhism, alt.sci.astro


****************SPV......The sly way to understand Enligthtenment is
to look at what you are daydreaming about. Every so often just wake
yourself up to see what you are thinking about. For example if you
find yourself just thinking about smashing someone's face or doing
something ugly with someone, you understand that you are angry and
that unconsciously the other side of the coin is going to be there
also and that would be fear. Always with anger comes fear. Men are
allowed to show anger but never fear. Women are allowed to feel fear
but never angry. That is what the passive anger and passive fear is
all about.

You see what movie the daydreaming mind is playing and then you look
for the unconscious or hidden emotion of the ego that is at work.

Is this too much for you idiots? After all 19 years an not a single
person has gotten Enlightened from this teaching. Just goes to show
you that you cannot teach Enlightenment. Osho was a great talking and
with 600 books not a single one of his people got Enlightened or
became Buddhas or Christs. Not a single one.

[duncan]

3.31.09  Month, date, year, post****Stephen Paul Vanier..........All
Rights Reserved ......Not to be reprinted or e-mailed or shared
without the written permission of the author Stephen Paul Vanier.
Copyrighted '09. ----- alt.consciousness.4th-way,
alt.zen,talk.religion.buddhism, alt.sci.astro
****************SPV......The sly way to understand Enligthtenment is
to look at what you are daydreaming about.  Every so often just wake
yourself up to see what you are thinking about.  For example if you
find yourself just thinking about smashing someone's face or doing
something ugly with someone, you understand that you are angry and
that unconsciously the other side of the coin is going to be there
also and that would be fear.  Always with anger comes fear.  Men are
allowed to show anger but never fear.  Women are allowed to feel fear
but never angry.  That is what the passive anger and passive fear is
all about.
You see what movie the daydreaming mind is playing and then you look
for the unconscious or hidden emotion of the ego that is at work.
Is this too much for you idiots?  After all 19 years an not a single
person has gotten Enlightened from this teaching.  Just goes to show
you that you cannot teach Enlightenment.  Osho was a great talking and
with 600 books not a single one of his people got Enlightened or
became Buddhas or Christs.  Not a single one.

Just goes to show, he was full of shit.

[Reverend Al]

Post by Chiun
3.31.09 Month, date, year, post****Stephen Paul Vanier..........All
Rights Reserved ......Not to be reprinted or e-mailed or shared
without the written permission of the author Stephen Paul Vanier.
Copyrighted '09. ----- alt.consciousness.4th-way,
alt.zen,talk.religion.buddhism, alt.sci.astro
****************SPV......The sly way to understand Enligthtenment is
to look at what you are daydreaming about.

Beginner's drivel, Veneer. When are you ever going to get serious?

Post by Chiun
Every so often just wake
yourself up to see what you are thinking about. For example if you
find yourself just thinking about smashing someone's face or doing
something ugly with someone, you understand that you are angry and
that unconsciously the other side of the coin is going to be there
also and that would be fear. Always with anger comes fear. Men are
allowed to show anger but never fear. Women are allowed to feel fear
but never angry. That is what the passive anger and passive fear is
all about.
You see what movie the daydreaming mind is playing and then you look
for the unconscious or hidden emotion of the ego that is at work.
Is this too much for you idiots? After all 19 years an not a single
person has gotten Enlightened from this teaching. Just goes to show
you that you cannot teach Enlightenment. Osho was a great talking and
with 600 books not a single one of his people got Enlightened or
became Buddhas or Christs. Not a single one.

[zenworm]

3.31.09  Month, date, year, post****Stephen Paul Vanier..........All
Rights Reserved ......Not to be reprinted or e-mailed or shared
without the written permission of the author Stephen Paul Vanier.
Copyrighted '09. ----- alt.consciousness.4th-way,
alt.zen,talk.religion.buddhism, alt.sci.astro
****************SPV......The sly way to understand Enligthtenment is
to look at what you are daydreaming about.  Every so often just wake
yourself up to see what you are thinking about.  For example if you
find yourself just thinking about smashing someone's face or doing
something ugly with someone, you understand that you are angry and
that unconsciously the other side of the coin is going to be there
also and that would be fear.  Always with anger comes fear.  Men are
allowed to show anger but never fear.  Women are allowed to feel fear
but never angry.  That is what the passive anger and passive fear is
all about.
You see what movie the daydreaming mind is playing and then you look
for the unconscious or hidden emotion of the ego that is at work.
Is this too much for you idiots?  After all 19 years an not a single
person has gotten Enlightened from this teaching.  Just goes to show
you that you cannot teach Enlightenment.  Osho was a great talking and
with 600 books not a single one of his people got Enlightened or
became Buddhas or Christs.  Not a single one.

enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

[Rev. RHL]

Post by zenworm
enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

Didn't he get to do a lot of drugs? Sounds like a nice position as
guru to me. I couldn't crack open one of his books though, didn't want
the cross-taint.

Personally, I'd posit for consideration that if one doesn't alternate
light with dark one goes blind one way or the other, or at least
becomes desensitized/oversensitized, then again I'm a occasional
inbetweener, which would explain a few things.

Of course, who's to say that it's really "light" which makes it
possible to see in the first place? Kabbalists? Scientists? Yo
Mamma?

[^@%>---*=#]

Post by zenworm
enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

Didn't he get to do a lot of drugs? Sounds like a nice position as
guru to me. I couldn't crack open one of his books though, didn't want
the cross-taint.


================================

it was said that he was inebriated
in some fashion almost continuously
and screwed a lot of underage girls
whilst on these drugs. exactly the
position i'd hope for were i to join
a cult.

[clown n]

Post by Rev. RHL

Post by zenworm
enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

Didn't he get to do a lot of drugs? Sounds like a nice position as
guru to me. I couldn't crack open one of his books though, didn't want
the cross-taint.
================================
it was said that he was inebriated
in some fashion almost continuously
and screwed a lot of underage girls
whilst on these drugs. exactly the
position i'd hope for were i to join
a cult.

you want to be an underage girl?

[^@%>---*=#]

Post by Rev. RHL

Post by zenworm
enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

Didn't he get to do a lot of drugs? Sounds like a nice position as
guru to me. I couldn't crack open one of his books though, didn't want
the cross-taint.
================================
it was said that he was inebriated
in some fashion almost continuously
and screwed a lot of underage girls
whilst on these drugs. exactly the
position i'd hope for were i to join
a cult.

you want to be an underage girl?

===========================

wanting to be is enough in itself

[zenworm]

Post by Rev. RHL

Post by zenworm
enlightenimg a few individuals was never Osho's intention
ZN

Didn't he get to do a lot of drugs? Sounds like a nice position as
guru to me. I couldn't crack open one of his books though, didn't want
the cross-taint.
Personally, I'd posit for consideration that if one doesn't alternate
light with dark one goes blind one way or the other, or at least
becomes desensitized/oversensitized, then again I'm a occasional
inbetweener, which would explain a few things.
Of course, who's to say that it's really "light" which makes it
possible to see in the first place? Kabbalists? Scientists? Yo
Mamma?

osho speaks via his recordings
listen for yourself and experience
ZN